Finance & Accounting

F02 · Introductory

Financial Statement Preparation

10 lessons

F02 · Module 4, lesson 1 · Lesson 9 of 10

Linking the statements

Put Lantern’s whole annual report together, check that its four statements articulate and find the error when they don’t, follow single transactions through all of them, see where the gap between profit and cash sits, and push one change through the three main statements the way analysts test a model.

About 80 minutes

Before you start

You will be able to

  • Trace a transaction through the income statement, the statement of changes in equity, the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows.
  • Use a preparer’s checklist of links to test whether a set of statements articulates, and locate the error when a link fails.
  • Locate each part of the gap between Lantern’s net income and its operating cash flow on the balance sheet, and judge which parts will reverse.
  • Calculate the effect of one change, such as $1,000 more depreciation with tax at 25%, on all three main statements, with the tax paid or still owed.
  • Interpret the linked statements to judge how much cash a business can afford to distribute.

Review first

Fictional case A fictional coffee business founded by Ana Lim. It starts as a catering and barista-training service, opens its own cafés and an online shop for beans, and plans a canned cold brew.

The idea

Fictional case

It is January 2027. Lantern’s accountant has closed the books for the ten months to 31 December 2026 and drafted the four statements. Before they go to Coastline Bank and to the dealer’s finance company that lent Lantern $20,000 for the van, she checks that they tell one consistent story: every figure that appears in two places must agree, and every change on the balance sheet must be explained somewhere else.

F01 introduced articulation on a single month: net income flows into equity, ending equity into the balance sheet, and ending cash from the statement of cash flows into the balance sheet. A full year adds inventory, bad debts, depreciation on two assets, accrued interest, income tax and a second dividend, so there are many more places for a link to break. This lesson puts Lantern’s whole annual report together, shows how a preparer finds an error when a link fails, follows single transactions through all four statements, and walks one change through the three main statements, the way analysts test a financial model.

The idea underneath every link is that comparative balance sheets list balances at two moments, and the other three statements explain how those balances moved in between. The income statement explains most of the change in retained earnings; the statement of changes in equity explains all of the change in equity; the statement of cash flows explains all of the change in cash. Any other balance sheet change is the other half of an entry whose first half appears on one of those statements, or a noncash investing and financing activity disclosed in a note.

How Lantern’s statements for the ten months to 31 December 2026 articulate (fictional figures in dollars).

Lantern makes the links easy to see because it began on 1 March 2026 with nothing: every opening balance is zero, so every closing balance on its balance sheet is also the year’s change. Cash of $42,940 is the year’s increase in cash; retained earnings of $22,387 are the year’s net income less the year’s dividends. From 2027 onward the opening balances will be the 2026 closing balances, and every link will compare two balance sheets.

Readers rely on the links as much as preparers do. A lender who sees profit rising while operating cash flow falls turns to the balance sheet to find where the cash went: into receivables, into inventory, or into paying suppliers faster. An owner who wants to know how much of the profit has been kept in the business looks at retained earnings. Each question is answered by reading two statements together, which only works if they articulate.

In depth

Lantern’s annual report

Here are the four statements the accountant drafted, in the order F01 taught. The income statement comes first, because net income feeds the statement of changes in equity; that statement comes next, because ending equity feeds the balance sheet; then the balance sheet; then the statement of cash flows, which explains the change in the balance sheet’s cash. The income statement is in the multi-step format and the statement of cash flows uses the direct method, followed by the indirect reconciliation of net income to operating cash flow.

Lantern Coffee Co.Income statement for the ten months ended 31 December 2026
Revenue
Catering Revenue$62,320
Training Revenue21,000
Online Sales Revenue111,025
Sales Returns and Allowances(1,025)
Net revenue$193,320
Cost of sales
Cost of Goods Sold$52,800
Cost of Services36,100
Total cost of sales$88,900
Net revenue$193,320
Less total cost of sales(88,900)
Gross profit$104,420
Operating expenses
Wages Expense$18,400
Rent Expense12,000
Utilities Expense2,860
Advertising Expense6,500
Insurance Expense1,500
Depreciation Expense4,800
Fuel Expense1,960
Shipping Expense12,630
Card and Platform Fees Expense4,010
Bad Debt Expense1,404
Miscellaneous Expense640
Total operating expenses$66,704
Gross profit$104,420
Less total operating expenses(66,704)
Operating income$37,716
Operating income$37,716
Interest Expense(1,200)
Income before income tax$36,516
Income before income tax$36,516
Income Tax Expense(9,129)
Net income$27,387
Lantern Coffee Co.Statement of changes in equity for the ten months ended 31 December 2026
Common stock
Balance, 1 March 2026$0
Shares issued20,000
Balance, 31 December 2026$20,000
Retained earnings
Balance, 1 March 2026$0
Net income27,387
Dividends(5,000)
Balance, 31 December 2026$22,387
Common stock$20,000
Retained earnings22,387
Total equity, 31 December 2026$42,387
Lantern Coffee Co.Balance sheet at 31 December 2026
Current assets
Cash$42,940
Accounts Receivable7,380
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts(584)
Inventory5,800
Supplies640
Prepaid Insurance300
Total current assets$56,476
Property and equipment
Equipment$12,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment(2,000)
Van30,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Van(2,800)
Total property and equipment$37,200
Total current assets$56,476
Total property and equipment37,200
Total assets$93,676
Current liabilities
Accounts Payable$9,210
Wages Payable2,100
Interest Payable750
Unearned Revenue6,100
Income Taxes Payable3,129
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt5,000
Total current liabilities$26,289
Noncurrent liabilities
Notes Payable$25,000
Total noncurrent liabilities$25,000
Equity
Common Stock$20,000
Retained Earnings22,387
Total equity$42,387
Total liabilities$51,289
Total equity42,387
Total liabilities and equity$93,676
Lantern Coffee Co.Statement of cash flows (direct method) for the ten months ended 31 December 2026
Operating activities
Cash received from customers$191,220
Cash paid to suppliers(103,330)
Cash paid to employees(41,500)
Interest paid(450)
Income taxes paid(6,000)
Net cash from operating activities$39,940
Investing activities
Purchase of equipment($12,000)
Purchase of van(10,000)
Net cash used in investing activities($22,000)
Financing activities
Issuance of common stock$20,000
Proceeds from notes payable10,000
Dividends paid(5,000)
Net cash from financing activities$25,000
Net cash from operating activities$39,940
Net cash used in investing activities(22,000)
Net cash from financing activities25,000
Cash, 1 March 20260
Cash, 31 December 2026$42,940

Noncash investing and financing: Van costing $30,000 acquired for $10,000 in cash (shown in investing activities) and $20,000 through a note payable.

Lantern Coffee Co.Cash flows from operating activities (indirect method) for the ten months ended 31 December 2026
Net income$27,387
Depreciation4,800
Increase in accounts receivable (net)(6,796)
Increase in inventory(5,800)
Increase in supplies(640)
Increase in prepaid insurance(300)
Increase in accounts payable9,210
Increase in wages payable2,100
Increase in interest payable750
Increase in unearned revenue6,100
Increase in income taxes payable3,129
Net cash from operating activities$39,940

The notes complete the report: Lantern’s accounting policies (first in, first out for inventory, straight-line depreciation with a full month in the month of purchase, the aging method for bad debts), the terms of its two notes payable, and the noncash part of the van purchase. Under the full disclosure principle a reader shouldn’t have to guess any of them.

The preparer’s checks

Before the statements leave the office, the accountant works through a list of links. Most are tie-outs, a comparison of the same figure in two places; the rest are roll-forwards, which need a short calculation. The last column says what a failed check usually points to, which is where the search for an error starts.

Articulation checks on Lantern’s 2026 statements (fictional figures in dollars)
CheckFigures that must agreeLanternA failure usually means
Net incomeIncome statement = statement of changes in equity = first line of the indirect method27,387 in all threeA copying or transposition error
Retained earningsOpening + net income − dividends = balance sheet0 + 27,387 − 5,000 = 22,387Dividends left out, or the trial balance’s opening figure used
EquityStatement of changes in equity = balance sheet20,000 + 22,387 = 42,387A share issue or dividend recorded in only one place
Balance sheetAssets = liabilities + equity93,676 = 51,289 + 42,387A balance left out, or an amount entered on one side only
CashOpening cash + operating + investing + financing = balance sheet cash0 + 39,940 − 22,000 + 25,000 = 42,940A noncash item treated as cash, a cash flow missed, or a sign error
Operating cash flowDirect method = indirect method39,940 both waysA sign error on a working-capital change
Income taxOpening + expense − amount paid = closing income taxes payable0 + 9,129 − 6,000 = 3,129The year-end tax entry missing or misstated
InterestOpening + expense − amount paid = closing interest payable0 + 1,200 − 450 = 750An accrual missed, or a payment posted to the wrong account
Accumulated depreciationOpening + depreciation expense − disposals = closing0 + 4,800 − 0 = 2,000 + 2,800Depreciation posted to the wrong account

The last three checks are roll-forwards, which the indirect method lesson used to rebuild cash flows; here they test the statements. Lantern’s opening balances are zero, but from 2027 every roll-forward starts from the previous year’s closing balance. Accounts receivable rolls forward the same way: opening $0, plus catering invoiced of $59,920, less cash collected of $51,720, less the $820 written off, gives $7,380, the gross balance on the balance sheet.

Passing every check is necessary, not sufficient. An expense posted to the wrong expense account, a noncurrent asset shown as current, or an adjusting entry left out of the ledger altogether leaves every link intact, because all four statements are drawn from the same ledger. The checks catch omissions and copying errors between the statements; review and judgement catch the rest.

Finding the error when a link fails

When a link fails, the size of the difference is the first clue. A difference equal to one item suggests that item was left out, counted twice, or is a noncash item treated as cash; a difference of exactly twice an item suggests it was entered with the wrong sign. The direction narrows the search further: a statement of cash flows that ends below the balance sheet’s cash has too little coming in or too much going out. Two errors can partly offset, so after fixing the first, measure the difference again; the challenging example below works through such a case.

One transaction, four statements

Following single transactions shows why the links hold. Each journal entry changes at least two accounts. When one of them is a revenue, expense or dividends account, the entry reaches equity; when one of them is Cash, it reaches the statement of cash flows. Four of Lantern’s entries show the patterns, and every amount in the income statement column also reaches the statement of changes in equity through net income.

Four Lantern entries traced through the statements (fictional figures in dollars)
EntryIncome statementBalance sheet at 31 DecemberStatement of cash flows
y4: van bought on 1 June for $30,000 ($10,000 in cash, $20,000 on a note)Nothing on the day; later depreciation of $2,800 (e4) and interest of $700 (part of e5)Van 30,000 less accumulated depreciation 2,800; note: 5,000 current, 15,000 noncurrentInvesting outflow 10,000; the 20,000 note disclosed as a noncash transaction
e5: interest accrued on 31 December, $750Interest expense 750 (1,200 for the year with the 450 paid)Interest payable 750No cash in 2026; the indirect method shows the increase in interest payable, offsetting the expense
y12: online shop, $111,025 shipped and $2,960 of subscriptions paid aheadOnline sales revenue 111,025Unearned revenue includes 2,960113,985 inside cash received from customers; indirect method: increase in unearned revenue
e7: Holiday Blend written down by $400Cost of goods sold 400 higher, so gross profit 400 lowerInventory 5,800, after the write-downNo cash; inside the inventory line of the indirect method

The van shows one decision touching every statement at different times. On 1 June it changed the balance sheet and, for the $10,000 paid, the investing section. The $20,000 borrowed from the dealer’s finance company never passed through Lantern’s bank account, so it is disclosed as a noncash investing and financing activity, and the instalments repaying it from June 2027 will be financing outflows. From June onward the van generated expenses: $400 a month of depreciation and $100 a month of interest (20,000 × 6% ÷ 12), both reducing net income and so retained earnings. At the year end, entry e8 moved the $5,000 due on 1 June 2027 into current liabilities, which changed the balance sheet’s classification and nothing else.

The write-down shows how an entry with no cash still reaches the statement of cash flows. In the indirect method it lowers income before tax by $400 and, after the $100 of tax it saves, net income by $300; it makes the increase in inventory $400 smaller (Lantern’s inventory line, $5,800, is measured after it); and, because Lantern’s 2026 tax is partly unpaid, it makes the increase in income taxes payable $100 smaller. The three effects, −300+400−100=0-300 + 400 - 100 = 0, cancel, as they must when no cash moves. Bad debt expense works the same way, through the net receivables line ($6,796, which already includes the $1,404 charge) and through income taxes payable.

Where the gap between profit and cash sits

The indirect method lesson reconciled Lantern’s net income of $27,387 with its $39,940 of cash from operations; the question here is where each part of the $12,553 gap sits and what happens to it next. Depreciation of $4,800 is the cost of assets already paid for or financed: the equipment and the van’s $10,000 down payment left through investing, and the $20,000 financed by the van note leaves through financing as it is repaid from June 2027. The $13,536 of operating current assets (net receivables, inventory, supplies and prepaid insurance) sits on the asset side of the balance sheet and turns into cash, or expense, in 2027. The $21,289 of operating current liabilities sits on the other side and financed more than the whole gap, but it reverses early in 2027, when Lantern pays the December bills, the wages and the tax, and delivers $6,100 of service it has already been paid for. A first year flatters operating cash flow this way, because a new business has no old liabilities to pay off, so a lender who projected $39,940 a year forward would be overestimating.

A three-statement walkthrough

Analysts test their understanding of the links, and their spreadsheet models, by pushing one change through all three main statements. The standard exercise: suppose depreciation is $1,000 higher, tax is 25% of income before tax, and the change in tax is paid in cash within the year.

  1. Income statement. Operating income and income before tax fall by $1,000. Income tax falls by 25%×1,000=25025\% \times 1{,}000 = 250, so net income falls by 1,000−250=7501{,}000 - 250 = 750.
  2. Statement of cash flows. Net income is $750 lower, but the $1,000 of depreciation is added back, so operating cash flow rises by −750+1,000=250-750 + 1{,}000 = 250: the tax saved. Investing and financing are unchanged.
  3. Balance sheet. Cash is $250 higher. Accumulated depreciation is $1,000 higher, so property and equipment (net) is $1,000 lower, and total assets fall by $750. Retained earnings fall by the $750 drop in net income. Assets −750 = liabilities 0 + equity −750: the balance sheet still balances.

Lantern’s own books add a twist. Its estimated tax payments were fixed at $6,000, and entry e9 sets Income Taxes Payable at the year’s tax expense less that amount, so none of a change in its 2026 tax is paid within 2026. If depreciation were $1,000 higher, the tax expense would be $250 lower and so would the payable; the saving would reach cash only when the 2026 tax is paid in 2027. For 2026, then: net income −750, depreciation +1,000, change in income taxes payable −250, so operating cash flow is unchanged; on the balance sheet, assets −1,000 = liabilities −250 + equity −750.

Formulas

Reading the size of a failed cash link

Gap={Xitem omitted, counted twice, or noncash treated as cash2Xitem entered with the wrong sign\text{Gap} = \begin{cases} X & \text{item omitted, counted twice, or noncash treated as cash} \\ 2X & \text{item entered with the wrong sign} \end{cases}
Gap\text{Gap}
Ending cash on the draft statement of cash flows minus cash on the balance sheet (or the reverse)$
XX
The amount of the item that is wrong$

Assumes. One error at a time. Two errors can partly offset, so measure the gap again after correcting the first.

Hatherley Print Studio: after the unpaid dividend is removed, a gap of 6,400=2×3,2006{,}400 = 2 \times 3{,}200 points to the sign of the $3,200 change in receivables.

After-tax effect of a change in a pretax expense

ΔNI=−(1−t) ΔX\Delta NI = -(1 - t)\,\Delta X
ΔNI\Delta NI
Change in net income$
ΔX\Delta X
Change in an expense deducted before tax (positive when the expense rises)$
tt
Tax rate on income before tax, as a decimal

Assumes. Tax is a fixed share of income before tax, as in the Lantern case (25%).

$1,000 more depreciation at 25%: ΔNI=−(1−0.25)×1,000=−750\Delta NI = -(1 - 0.25) \times 1{,}000 = -750.

Cash and tax payable after a change in a noncash expense

ΔCFO=t×p×ΔN,ΔTax payable=−t×(1−p)×ΔN\Delta \text{CFO} = t \times p \times \Delta N, \qquad \Delta \text{Tax payable} = -t \times (1 - p) \times \Delta N
ΔCFO\Delta \text{CFO}
Change in cash from operating activities$
ΔTax payable\Delta \text{Tax payable}
Change in income taxes payable at the year end$
ΔN\Delta N
Change in a tax-deductible noncash expense, such as depreciation or a write-down$
tt
Tax rate on income before tax, as a decimal
pp
Share of the change in tax that is paid within the year (1 if all of it, 0 if none)

Assumes. The expense itself moves no cash; only the tax it changes does, and only when that tax is paid.

$1,000 more depreciation at 25%: with p=1p = 1, ΔCFO=250\Delta \text{CFO} = 250; for Lantern in 2026, p=0p = 0, so ΔCFO=0\Delta \text{CFO} = 0 and income taxes payable fall by 250.

Worked examples

A first example: Finding the missing links for a bakery

Fictional figures

Thornwick Bakery Inc., a fictional company, has drafted its statements for the year. Retained earnings were $30,000 at the start of the year and $66,000 at the end; net income was $48,000. Cash was $9,000 at the start of the year; operating activities provided $52,000, investing activities used $35,000 and financing activities used $10,000. The balance sheet shows cash of $16,000, total assets of $214,000, liabilities of $98,000 and common stock of $50,000. The dividends figure is missing from the draft: find it, and check the links.

  1. Retained earnings link, solved for dividends: D=REbeg+NI−REend=30,000+48,000−66,000=12,000D = RE_{\text{beg}} + NI - RE_{\text{end}} = 30{,}000 + 48{,}000 - 66{,}000 = 12{,}000.
  2. Cash link: 9,000+52,000−35,000−10,000=16,0009{,}000 + 52{,}000 - 35{,}000 - 10{,}000 = 16{,}000, the balance sheet’s cash. The statement of cash flows explains the whole change in cash, 16,000−9,000=7,00016{,}000 - 9{,}000 = 7{,}000.
  3. Equity link: total equity =50,000+66,000=116,000= 50{,}000 + 66{,}000 = 116{,}000, assuming no stock was issued during the year.
  4. Balance sheet: 98,000+116,000=214,00098{,}000 + 116{,}000 = 214{,}000, equal to total assets.

Answer. Dividends were $12,000. Every link holds: retained earnings 30,000 + 48,000 − 12,000 = 66,000; cash 9,000 + 52,000 − 35,000 − 10,000 = 16,000; assets $214,000 = liabilities $98,000 + equity $116,000.

What it means. The links let a reader recover a figure that isn’t printed: dividends declared follow from the opening and closing retained earnings and net income. Thornwick paid out a quarter of its profit (12,000 ÷ 48,000) and kept the rest in the business. Passing every check shows the statements are consistent, not that every figure in them is right.

A harder example: A statement of cash flows that doesn’t tie

Fictional figures

Hatherley Print Studio Inc., a fictional company, began the year with cash of $14,300 and retained earnings of $22,000. Its draft statement of cash flows, prepared by the indirect method, is below; it ends at $19,800, but the balance sheet, taken from the ledger, shows cash of $22,400. The balance sheet also shows retained earnings of $54,200 and a $9,000 dividend payable: the board declared a dividend on 15 December, payable on 10 January. Net income was $41,200. Find the errors and correct the statement.

Hatherley Print Studio: draft and corrected statement of cash flows (fictional, $)
LineDraftCorrected
Net income41,20041,200
Depreciation6,5006,500
Increase in accounts receivable3,200(3,200)
Increase in inventory(2,700)(2,700)
Increase in accounts payable1,8001,800
Net cash from operating activities50,00043,600
Purchase of equipment (investing)(27,500)(27,500)
Repayment of loan principal(8,000)(8,000)
Dividends paid(9,000)0
Net cash used in financing activities(17,000)(8,000)
Cash at the start of the year14,30014,300
Cash at the end of the year19,80022,400
  1. Retained earnings link: 22,000+41,200−9,000=54,20022{,}000 + 41{,}200 - 9{,}000 = 54{,}200, which agrees with the balance sheet. A dividend reduces retained earnings when it is declared, paid or not, so this link can’t reveal whether the dividend was paid.
  2. Cash link: the draft ends at 19,800 but the balance sheet shows 22,400, so the draft is 22,400−19,800=2,60022{,}400 - 19{,}800 = 2{,}600 short.
  3. The dividend payable says the $9,000 was not paid in the year, yet the draft shows it as paid. Removing it raises financing to −8,000-8{,}000 and the ending cash to 19,800+9,000=28,80019{,}800 + 9{,}000 = 28{,}800, now 28,800−22,400=6,40028{,}800 - 22{,}400 = 6{,}400 too high.
  4. A remaining difference of exactly twice an item points to a sign error: 6,400=2×3,2006{,}400 = 2 \times 3{,}200. Receivables increased, which ties up cash, so the change must be subtracted. Operating cash flow becomes 41,200+6,500−3,200−2,700+1,800=43,60041{,}200 + 6{,}500 - 3{,}200 - 2{,}700 + 1{,}800 = 43{,}600.
  5. Corrected ending cash: 14,300+43,600−27,500−8,000=22,40014{,}300 + 43{,}600 - 27{,}500 - 8{,}000 = 22{,}400, the balance sheet’s figure. The unpaid dividend appears as a current liability, not as a cash flow; it will be a financing outflow next year, when it is paid.

Answer. Two errors: the unpaid $9,000 dividend shown as paid, and the $3,200 increase in receivables added instead of subtracted. Corrected: operating activities $43,600; investing ($27,500); financing ($8,000); ending cash $22,400, as on the balance sheet.

What it means. The two errors partly offset, so the $2,600 difference matched neither of them. Working through the links one at a time, and using the clue that a difference of exactly twice an item points to a sign error, found both. The corrected statement also changes the story: operations provided $6,400 less cash than the draft claimed.

Applied: a business decision: How much cash can Ana take out of Lantern?

Fictional figures

In January 2027 Ana asks whether Lantern can pay her a $20,000 dividend. Use the 2026 statements: retained earnings $22,387; cash $42,940; current liabilities $26,289, of which $6,100 is unearned revenue. Lantern’s fixed cash costs in 2027 are kitchen rent of $1,200 a month, shop and office wages at 2026’s rate ($18,400 for the ten months) and the $48,000 a year salary Lantern pays Ana from 2027. Assume Lantern wants to keep at least three months of those fixed costs in the bank as a cushion.

  1. Earnings test: a $20,000 dividend is within retained earnings of $22,387, so it would not pay out more profit than Lantern has kept.
  2. Cash already claimed: current liabilities of 26,289 include 6,100 of unearned revenue, which Lantern settles by delivering service, not by paying cash. The rest, 26,289−6,100=20,18926{,}289 - 6{,}100 = 20{,}189, needs cash within the year, including the $5,000 van instalment and $3,129 of tax.
  3. Cash left after those payments: 42,940−20,189=22,75142{,}940 - 20{,}189 = 22{,}751.
  4. Cushion: monthly fixed cash costs in 2027 are rent 1,200 + shop and office wages 18,400÷10=1,84018{,}400 \div 10 = 1{,}840 + Ana’s salary 48,000÷12=4,00048{,}000 \div 12 = 4{,}000, so 7,0407{,}040. Three months is 3×7,040=21,1203 \times 7{,}040 = 21{,}120, and the largest dividend that keeps the cushion is about 22,751−21,120=1,63122{,}751 - 21{,}120 = 1{,}631.
  5. Timing: $21,289 of 2026’s operating cash flow came from operating liabilities that reverse in 2027; delivering the $6,100 of prepaid service will use cash (baristas, beans, materials) without bringing any in; and the insurance policy expires on 28 February 2027 and must be renewed. The cushion is not generous.

Answer. A $20,000 dividend passes the earnings test but fails the cash test: it would leave about $2,751 after known payments, less than half a month of 2027’s fixed costs. On these assumptions a dividend of about $1,600 is the most Lantern can afford now; a larger one should wait until 2027’s own operating cash has come in, and Ana should check the loan agreements first, since lenders’ covenants often limit dividends.

What it means. Retained earnings show how much of the profit earned has been kept in the business; state law and lenders’ covenants set what Lantern may legally distribute, and the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows show what it can afford. Here the linked statements also explain why the bank balance looks bigger than the business’s spare cash: much of it is owed to suppliers, staff, lenders and the tax authorities, or has been paid by customers for work still to do.

Explore

Build Lantern’s annual report from the year’s summary entries and adjustments (y1–y30, e1–e9). Place each account on its statement, then work out net income, ending retained earnings and total assets; the tool checks each link and shows all four statements, including the statement of cash flows.

Loading the interactive…

Push a change in depreciation through the three main statements. Change the amount, the tax rate and the share of the change in tax that is paid within the year, and watch which figures move and how the balance sheet stays in balance.

Loading the interactive…

Analyse seven of Lantern’s entries, from the van in June to the year-end income tax. For each, choose the accounts, the sides and the amounts, then tick every statement it changes and, if cash moves, the activity. Watch for the entries that change the statement of cash flows without touching the income statement, and the reverse.

Loading the interactive…

Common mistakes

  • “Tax can be left out of a three-statement walkthrough.”

    Without tax, $1,000 more depreciation would lower net income by $1,000 and leave cash unchanged. With tax at 25%, net income falls by only $750, and the $250 of tax saved is cash once the tax is paid. Every pretax change has a tax echo on all three statements: in income tax expense, in cash or income taxes payable, and in retained earnings.

  • “If the balance sheet balances, the statements are right.”

    Balancing is one test among several. Hatherley Print Studio’s balance sheet balanced while its statement of cash flows was wrong in two places. Run every link, and remember that some errors, such as an expense posted to the wrong expense account, break none of them.

  • “A dividend reduces cash when it is declared.”

    Declaring a dividend reduces retained earnings and creates Dividends Payable; cash falls only when it is paid, and that payment is the financing outflow. A December declaration paid in January appears in this year’s statement of changes in equity and next year’s statement of cash flows.

  • “The tax saved by an extra expense is always cash this year.”

    Only if the change in tax is paid within the year. Lantern’s estimated payments were fixed at $6,000, so $1,000 more depreciation would lower income taxes payable by $250 and leave 2026’s operating cash flow unchanged; the cash saving arrives when the tax is paid in 2027.

  • “Operating cash flow above net income is always good news.”

    Lantern’s operating cash flow exceeds its net income by $12,553, but $21,289 of its operating cash came from liabilities that will be paid, or worked off, early in 2027. Read where each part of the gap sits before drawing a conclusion from its size.

  • “An entry with no cash never appears in the statement of cash flows.”

    It never changes a cash total, but it can still appear. The accrued interest (e5) shows up in Lantern’s indirect reconciliation as an increase in interest payable, offsetting its effect on net income and on income taxes payable, and the $20,000 van note appears in the noncash disclosure beneath the statement. Count an entry as a cash flow only when cash moves.

Guided practice

Work through these with hints when you need them. Every hint and every worked solution is there to be used.

Loading four questions…

On your own

No hints this time. Answer, check, and read the feedback; the solution appears once you have answered or if you ask for it. Your first answers count toward mastery.

Loading six questions…

In practice

Coastline Bank’s credit analyst receives Lantern’s annual report in February 2027. Before calculating anything she repeats the accountant’s checks, because statements that don’t articulate can’t be relied on, and then reads the statements in pairs. The income statement and the statement of cash flows together show that Lantern’s operations produced more cash than profit; the balance sheet shows why: $21,289 of operating liabilities, most of which fall due early in 2027.

Her next step is a forecast for 2027, which she builds as a three-statement model. Assumptions about sales, margins, how quickly customers pay and suppliers are paid, and capital spending drive a forecast income statement and balance sheet; the statement of cash flows is derived from the changes between the two balance sheets. The links are the model’s skeleton. Forecast net income feeds retained earnings, forecast depreciation feeds accumulated depreciation and the add-back, and the van note’s $5,000 instalment reduces both cash and the liability. If the forecast balance sheet doesn’t balance, a link is missing, and she finds it the way the accountant finds errors in a draft: by the size and direction of the difference.

The model answers the lender’s real question: can Lantern pay the $5,000 instalment and $1,200 of interest due on the van note on 1 June 2027, and $600 of interest on the Coastline note during the year, from its own operations, now that it also pays Ana a salary? Read together, the 2026 statements suggest it can, provided the first year’s timing benefit is not mistaken for a permanent level of cash flow. Ratios that summarise this kind of judgement, such as cash flow relative to debt payments, belong to F03; the reasoning they rest on is the articulation in this lesson.

Knowledge check

Six questions, one attempt each, no hints. Score 80% or more to complete the lesson; you can take it again at any time.

Loading six questions…

Summary

  • Comparative balance sheets list balances at two moments; the income statement, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of cash flows explain how they moved in between.
  • Three links and one identity: net income to the statement of changes in equity, ending equity to the balance sheet, ending cash to the balance sheet, and assets = liabilities + equity. Lantern: 27,387; 42,387; 42,940; 93,676 = 51,289 + 42,387.
  • Roll-forwards (opening + movements = closing) extend the checks to tax, interest, accumulated depreciation and receivables. When a link fails, a gap equal to an item suggests an omission and twice an item a sign error.
  • A transaction reaches equity through any revenue, expense or dividend it touches and the statement of cash flows through any cash it moves; an entry with no cash changes no cash total, though it may appear as offsetting reconciliation lines or in the noncash disclosure.
  • Lantern’s $12,553 gap between operating cash flow and net income sits in three places: depreciation of $4,800 on assets already paid for or financed, $13,536 of operating current assets, and $21,289 of operating current liabilities that reverse early in 2027.
  • One change through three statements: $1,000 more depreciation at 25% lowers net income by $750; operating cash flow rises by $250 only if the change in tax is paid within the year, otherwise income taxes payable fall instead.
  • Retained earnings show how much of the profit earned has been kept in the business; state law and lenders’ covenants set what it may legally distribute, and the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows show what it can afford.

Key formulas

Terms introduced

Annual report
The document a business issues after its financial year: the financial statements and their notes, and, for larger companies, management’s commentary and the auditor’s report.
Roll-forward
A check or schedule that starts from an account’s opening balance, adds and subtracts the period’s movements and arrives at its closing balance, with each movement traced to another statement or to the ledger.
Tie-out
Confirming that a figure shown in one statement or note agrees with the same figure wherever else it appears and with the ledger.
Three-statement model
A financial model in which the income statement, balance sheet and statement of cash flows are linked, so that a change in one assumption flows through all three and the forecast balance sheet still balances.

Sources

  1. Franklin, M., Graybeal, P. & Cooper, D. (2019). Principles of Accounting, Volume 1: Financial Accounting, section 2.1, “Describe the Income Statement, Statement of Owner’s Equity, Balance Sheet, and Statement of Cash Flows, and How They Interrelate”. OpenStax. openstax.org/books/principles-financial-accounting/pages/2-1…
  2. Franklin, M., Graybeal, P. & Cooper, D. (2019). Principles of Accounting, Volume 1: Financial Accounting, section 16.3, “Prepare the Statement of Cash Flows Using the Indirect Method”. OpenStax. openstax.org/books/principles-financial-accounting/pages/16-…
  3. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Beginners’ Guide to Financial Statements (“Cash Flow Statements” and “Bringing It All Together”). sec.gov/about/reports-publications/beginners-guide-financial…